The same fund, three countries,
three different answers.
Indian regulation barely distinguishes between one non-resident investor and another. Your country of residence does. The same fund can be a sensible holding in Dubai, a reporting headache in London and a real tax trap in New Jersey. Nothing on the factsheet tells you which one you are looking at.
These three guides start from where you file your taxes, not from the product shelf. Each is written against the rules that actually govern you, published by the IRS, HMRC and the UAE Federal Tax Authority. Where the law is unsettled, we say so instead of rounding it off into a confident answer.
By Yash Jhaveri, Founder & CEO, Beyond
Beyond · JSL Wealth Management · Vadodara · ARN XXXXX
Last reviewed September 2026 · Regulatory position as at September 2026
India does not restrict you
Portfolio management regulations carry no residency condition at all, and the AIF regulations expressly permit foreign and non-resident investors. Where a house declines you, that is its own commercial decision, usually driven by your country's rules, not India's.
The structure decides the tax
A managed account holding shares in your own name and a fund issuing you units are treated very differently in all three corridors, sometimes as the difference between a capital gain and income. It is the first question to ask, not the last.
Indian law changed underneath everyone
India replaced its entire income tax statute on 1 April 2026. Any page quoting the old section numbers is quoting a repealed Act, so we describe Indian rules by what they do and cite numbers only where they are stable.
Education, not advice. We may earn referral fees when you invest through us. Full disclosures